⚖️ Anthropic AI Fair Use Ruling Sets Legal Precedent — But Piracy Trial Looms

NewBits Media
Jun 28
3 min read

In a historic ruling, a U.S. federal judge has declared that AI companies can legally train their models on copyrighted content — as long as they obtain it legally. The decision, handed down by Senior U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, is the first of its kind to directly apply the doctrine of fair use to AI training practices.

🧠 What Happened?

Three authors — Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson — filed a lawsuit against AI company Anthropic, accusing it of using their copyrighted books to train its chatbot, Claude, without permission. They alleged that Anthropic scanned print books and downloaded pirated digital versions to feed its models.

✅ Fair Use Win (With a Catch)

Judge Alsup ruled that training an AI on legally purchased or scanned books is “exceedingly transformative” and falls under fair use — comparing it to how human writers learn by reading others’ work.

“All Anthropic did was replace the print copies it had purchased with searchable digital versions for internal use.” — Judge Alsup

❌ But Piracy Charges Still Stand

However, Alsup did not let Anthropic off the hook entirely. The company also downloaded over 7 million pirated books, which the judge said could not be excused under fair use.

“We will have a trial on the pirated copies… and the resulting damages.” — Alsup

💥 Potential Penalty: $1 Trillion

Under U.S. copyright law, statutory damages for willful infringement can reach up to $150,000 per work. With 7 million works in question, Anthropic faces up to $1.05 trillion in liability if found guilty in the upcoming December 2025 trial.

👥 Reactions: A Divided Response

Anthropic praised the fair use ruling as a win for innovation, stating that AI models, like writers, create something new — not copies.

The Authors Guild disagreed with any ruling that allows AI training on copyrighted books, but CEO Mary Rasenberger admitted the piracy trial could strongly benefit authors due to high damages.

Legal experts view this as a precedent that favors AI companies — as long as they don’t rely on pirated data.

“These rulings are guiding where the legal lines will be drawn for future AI models.” — Ray Seilie, AI & IP Attorney

📌 What the Anthropic AI Fair Use Ruling Means for the Future of AI

This case, alongside a similar Meta win in a separate lawsuit, is shaping the legal future of AI development. The message from the courts so far:

✅ Training on legally obtained content = OK

❌ Piracy = High risk

🤷 Output mimicry and international laws = Still murky

As AI development accelerates, the Anthropic AI Fair Use ruling lays the groundwork for a more stable, ethical, and lawful approach to model training — if companies are willing to follow the rules.

Enjoyed this article?

Stay ahead of the curve by subscribing to NewBits Digest, our weekly newsletter featuring curated AI stories, insights, and original content—from foundational concepts to the bleeding edge.

👉 Subscribe to NewBits Digest

👉 Register or Login at newbits.ai to like, comment, and join the conversation.

Want to explore more?

AI Solutions Directory: Discover AI models, tools & platforms.
AI Ed: Learn through our podcast series, From Bits to Breakthroughs.
AI Hub: Engage across our community and social platforms.

And remember, “It’s all about the bits…especially the new bits.”